I would like to tell you why a new theory of matter is needed, but you won't believe me. Maybe after I have proven that things aren't always what we have been told they are will you try to look at the alternative objectively. To circumvent the escape route of disbelief before examination, this website is dedicated to showing material that is contrary to the Standard Model's explanations of how our universe operates without giving an alternative reason up front. No mention of what ultrawave theory is based upon will need to be given until after you have examined the last four pages on this website.

The problem with knowledge is that it tends to color one's thinking, whether or not that knowledge is right or wrong. Many of you when reading the first paragraph of this page made up your minds that this must be a bunch of hooey (to put it mildly). What you don't want to do is take the time to read anything that disagrees with your current beliefs. I assure you that I would never have believed this either if I had not discovered it for myself. All I did was ask a couple of questions that shouldn't have been asked, and when I solved the equations that were required by these "silly" questions the answers all came out right. From the answers to these questions about the nature of matter and energy, an entire view of the Universe emerged that made much more sense that what I had previously believed (what I had learned through the normal physics channels). If you can put your predjudices behind you, I believe that you will begin to understand what it is that I discovered.

Several pages of proof that are contrary to the Standard Model (SM) are available on the left. They are things that I knew must be true if what I discovered about the true nature of the Universe was correct. The first page is titled H2O (water and ice)—the other pages of evidence appear below it. It was a real eye-opener to find such a simple example of how QT is wrong about the construction of matter using something as simple as water. This is the most compelling argument that I have found for not believing the SM explanations for the quantum.

At present, there are four examples, and I hope to find more. The first two proof pages contain findings worthy of front-page science news, as they are so contrary to what we have been taught that even those who are not interested in science might take note. The other two pages will show that there are equally believable explanations besides those of the SM for some aspects of the physical measurements of atomic matter.

Caution, once you have read the evidence contained on this website, you may find it hard to deny that there could be a better explanation of the Universe than that of quantum theory, or the SM in general.

[A special note about this website: The current file editor does not support subscript and superscript; therefore, you will have to intuit where they are meant to be used in most cases. The exception being that "The Constants" page required using alphabetic rather than numeric characters in the subscripts and superscripts. This necessitated uploading several pages of text as picture files making them look correct, but they cannot be edited on the site, which is why it was not done that way everywhere.]